The Divine Conversation
The Internal and the Outer conversation
The conversations that wij have can be waterput into two groups, the Inward and the Outer. When wij reflect ter our mind, or internally, wij tend to converse with a source or internal higher power. When wij externalize thesis thoughts through spoken or written communication, wij project our internal will into the outer will. I have questioned just where this inward dialogue originates from. I am aware that what wij choose to permit into our potencial landscape permits it into the outer sphere or public sphere.
When I think of the stories of demons and angels, I tend to view them spil messengers or idea communicators inbetween the inward and outer realms of the self. This is conversation inbetween the spirit, mind and figure with the physical, spiritual, astral and akashic spheres. They can also be seen spil the feelings, thoughts or deeds of others. When wij engage with others wij are acting with self (internal) and the outer physical of others. Thesis interactions are the reflections that wij are projecting into the world.
The energy fields or transmissions that wij collect are from the network of energy manifestations of all living or active concepts ter the universe. When a person is acting ter an irrational manner, one could infer that they have bot influenced by a negative idea or demon. The same could be said if they were acting te a positive manner spil a possession or influence of an vishaak. But ter reality, the energy or concept remains indeterminado until accepted or internalized spil an practice.
Beliefs Create Results
I have never bot able to just accept what is given to mij. When my son, Ethan, wasgoed sick, I didn’t believe that there wasgoed no chance for him to get well. I didn’t want to hear people with their words of assurance (i.e.: “It’s maker’s will”), or look upon their tears and sad faces. To witness that look of despair or acknowledgement that death and agony would be my son’s destined fate.
I noticed that when I erased the idea or notion, that “this is the way it is. ” or disregarded the symptoms (didn’t worry about them), that it wouldn’t toebijten. On the side effects, if I would worry about them, he would acquire them. If I didn’t think about it, it would magically go away. I tested this theory with a bone disease he had acquired with the fancy name of Avascular Necrosis (bones dying).
I wished to go research it out, but that internal voice, said no. The doctor told mij that my son might not be able to walk and could be wheelchair tied until he stopped growing. The doctor with all his wisdom had announced his version of possibilities. They desired to go te and liquidate the dead bone by chiseling it off. I refused this treatment. I said he will be fine. I didn’t give it any more thought and it miraculously resolved itself.
I have always had to seek “it” out. Look ter the outer for clues to the answers that lie within. This wasgoed the ultimate paradox for mij. When I look inwardly for direction. Why go looking for “it” outwardly at all? Spil far spil dogmatic ideology, I repelled anything with an absolute mindset. I choose to go after “anything is possible” philosophies. I despise the idea that anyone knows what is absolutely best for mij, or has the “right” response or “Truth”. I have a hard time with the idea that anyone can label mij spil anything. I have experienced a realization that the ogenblik when an idea is concrete and willed spil a declaration, or observed, it is then that it becomes instantaneously, so.
When my friend mentioned the Logos and the word that wij choose to speak, I understood this concept instantaneously. What wij will and say can have repercussions. When I get ter a bad mood, or permit the paranoid thoughts to set ter, or when it causes mij anxiety and physical unrest – that is when I am the most dangerous person to myself and the world. When a person is living actively, the person’s thoughts and deeds, along with their emotions can determine their fate. It is wise to choose your thoughts and words. It is a good rule of thumb to not suffer or entertain negative thoughts or negation ter any form. The end objective is to make everything you do, have meaning and purpose.
Manifesting and Living ter the Present
If I vereiste circumcise or choose my words and deeds wisely, living with intent, so that my manifestations become the physical reality that I dwell ter, I voorwaarde not permit any other thoughts to penetrate my being, accept those that come from the spirit that dwells within.
With that being said, merienda I am able to master my house and figure, I would be able to master and control the nature that surrounds mij. What I say or desire would be my fate unless acted upon by the same subconscious projections of others ter this sphere. When I can master the coerces of nature within the self, I can then master the coerces of nature that surround mij. I can weave and control my fate.
If I do not accept the fate that I conceive. then it will not become an absolute. Whatever I accept spil true and permissible becomes the possible. What I choose to solidify spil truth, becomes my truth. What i tend to obsess about becomes the reality that I live te. Within reason and ter the facilities of my mind and the capability of universal laws of nature, time, space and causality. Bearing on the limitations that I set, that I request, that I proclaim. So if I don’t give way to the ideas, will that be the reality for mij?
When the worries fester. when the conversations that lack intent or purpose take center stage. am I being the disruptive force ter my own way? Ter letting go will I receive all? Is it truly that ordinary?
When I said perhaps, our conversations were holy conversations, even spil a taunt, there may have bot a little “truth” ter the statement, ter regards to Divine Conversation. When what wij talk about evokes events and is manifested te daily lessons and interactions, it leads mij to believe they are divine timed and inspired, holy conversations. When it influences the environment surrounding mij, effecting mij on different levels, this creates an internal switch that reflects into the outer. This conversation becomes an inward one, albeit projected outwardly.